Safe to publish
- High-level research questions
- Sanitized lessons and governance frameworks
- Approved professional history
- Generalized architecture functions
- Corrections and evidence labels
Privacy & disclosure
Credibility does not require exposure.
The project publishes enough evidence to support its claims while withholding anything that meaningfully increases risk to the family, home, or production environment.
Publish only after approval
- Substantial new claims
- Family information or quotes
- Detailed technical disclosures
- Employer-specific outcomes
- Monetization or sponsorship terms
Never publish
- Credentials or endpoints
- Network topology
- Precise household telemetry or routines
- Raw camera or voice material
- Private family information
01 / SEPARATION
No production connection
The public site is static. It does not query Washu, expose a live feed, or create a bridge into the home.
02 / MINIMIZATION
Prove only what must be proved
Artifacts are cropped, generalized, paraphrased, or withheld to remove unnecessary attack surface and personal detail.
03 / CONSENT
Family privacy outranks the story
No family member becomes public material by proximity to the project. Personal stories require specific approval.
04 / CORRECTION
The safer record can still be honest
Redaction is disclosed. Uncertainty is labeled. Corrections remain visible. The site never implies that withheld detail is stronger proof than it is.
PUBLIC IDENTITY / PRIVATE LIFE
Paul’s work can become highly visible without making his household highly visible.
Public materials omit direct phone numbers, personal addresses, family names and routines, exact location details, private contact information, and incidental biographical facts that do not serve the professional or research record.